quickhits:

Can we get a press that reports on reality over here?

Michael Grunwald, Time:
It’s really amazing to see political reporters dutifully passing along Republican complaints that President Obama’s opening offer in the fiscal cliff talks is just a recycled version of his old plan, when those same reporters spent the last year dutifully passing along Republican complaints that Obama had no plan. It’s even more amazing to see them pass along Republican outrage that Obama isn’t cutting Medicare enough, in the same matter-of-fact tone they used during the campaign to pass along Republican outrage that Obama was cutting Medicare.
This isn’t just cognitive dissonance. It’s irresponsible reporting. Mainstream media outlets don’t want to look partisan, so they ignore the BS hidden in plain sight, the hypocrisy and dishonesty that defines the modern Republican Party. I’m old enough to remember when Republicans insisted that anyone who said they wanted to cut Medicare was a demagogue, because I’m more than three weeks old.
I’ve written a lot about the GOP’s defiance of reality–its denial of climate science, its simultaneous denunciations of Medicare cuts and government health care, its insistence that debt-exploding tax cuts will somehow reduce the debt—so I often get accused of partisanship. But it’s simply a fact that Republicans controlled Washington during the fiscally irresponsible era when President Clinton’s budget surpluses were transformed into the trillion-dollar deficit that President Bush bequeathed to President Obama. (The deficit is now shrinking.) It’s simply a fact that the fiscal cliff was created in response to GOP threats to force the U.S. government to default on its obligations. The press can’t figure out how to weave those facts into the current narrative without sounding like it’s taking sides, so it simply pretends that yesterday never happened.

That’s just a taste. You should read the whole thing. If you happen to be a journalist, you should find the nearest chalkboard and copy the whole thing down 100 times. Preferably while wearing a dunce cap.
Democracy can’t work this way. We have a free press for a reason. We need a press that’s free to challenge assertions that are clearly false and, in doing so, makes sure we have an informed electorate. We have a free press, but we might as well not. They have the freedom, but they don’t use it. And our democracy is weaker because of it.

quickhits:

Can we get a press that reports on reality over here?

Michael Grunwald, Time:

It’s really amazing to see political reporters dutifully passing along Republican complaints that President Obama’s opening offer in the fiscal cliff talks is just a recycled version of his old plan, when those same reporters spent the last year dutifully passing along Republican complaints that Obama had no plan. It’s even more amazing to see them pass along Republican outrage that Obama isn’t cutting Medicare enough, in the same matter-of-fact tone they used during the campaign to pass along Republican outrage that Obama was cutting Medicare.

This isn’t just cognitive dissonance. It’s irresponsible reporting. Mainstream media outlets don’t want to look partisan, so they ignore the BS hidden in plain sight, the hypocrisy and dishonesty that defines the modern Republican Party. I’m old enough to remember when Republicans insisted that anyone who said they wanted to cut Medicare was a demagogue, because I’m more than three weeks old.

I’ve written a lot about the GOP’s defiance of reality–its denial of climate science, its simultaneous denunciations of Medicare cuts and government health care, its insistence that debt-exploding tax cuts will somehow reduce the debt—so I often get accused of partisanship. But it’s simply a fact that Republicans controlled Washington during the fiscally irresponsible era when President Clinton’s budget surpluses were transformed into the trillion-dollar deficit that President Bush bequeathed to President Obama. (The deficit is now shrinking.) It’s simply a fact that the fiscal cliff was created in response to GOP threats to force the U.S. government to default on its obligations. The press can’t figure out how to weave those facts into the current narrative without sounding like it’s taking sides, so it simply pretends that yesterday never happened.

That’s just a taste. You should read the whole thing. If you happen to be a journalist, you should find the nearest chalkboard and copy the whole thing down 100 times. Preferably while wearing a dunce cap.

Democracy can’t work this way. We have a free press for a reason. We need a press that’s free to challenge assertions that are clearly false and, in doing so, makes sure we have an informed electorate. We have a free press, but we might as well not. They have the freedom, but they don’t use it. And our democracy is weaker because of it.

(via inothernews)

John Kerry was still at the Democratic National Convention this year and Howard Dean was made the chairman of the DNC after his losing presidential bid. 

On the flip side, George W. Bush actually was the president for 8 years and doesn’t seem to get invited to any major Republican events. Now that Mitt Romney is officially not the president, Republicans are working toward totally distancing themselves from him. Don’t be surprised if, after a month or so, he isn’t in the spotlight in the slightest. Unless he sells a book we won’t see him because the Republican Party - on a national level - doesn’t want losers hanging around. They don’t want to be associated with it. John McCain is obviously still around but it’s hard to get rid of a guy who’s been a senator for 25 years. 

I could be wrong about this but the GOP just seems like a less forgiving, colder group. I could be wrong about this.

"‎”I wish my moderate Republican friends would simply be honest. They all say they’re voting for Romney because of his economic policies (tenuous and ill-formed as they are), and that they disagree with him on gay rights. Fine. Then look me in the eye, speak with a level clear voice, and say,” My taxes and take-home pay mean more than your fundamental civil rights, the sanctity of your marriage, your right to visit an ailing spouse in the hospital, your dignity as a citizen of this country, your healthcare, your right to inherit, the mental welfare and emotional well-being of your youth, and your very personhood.” It’s like voting for George Wallace during the Civil Rights movements, and apologizing for his racism. You’re still complicit. You’re still perpetuating anti-gay legislation and cultural homophobia. You don’t get to walk away clean, because you say you “disagree” with your candidate on these issues."

— Doug Wright, Pulitzer and Tony Award winning playwright. (via laughinacorner)

kateoplis:

“[T]o anyone paying the slightest bit of attention to facts, Ryan’s speech was an apparent attempt to set the world record for the greatest number of blatant lies and misrepresentations slipped into a single political speech. On this measure, while it was Romney who ran the Olympics, Ryan earned…

Again, Paul Ryan’s lies.  

Politicians lie.  We all know that.  That’s what they’re famous for.  But there is a striking disproportion in the lying being done between Republicans and Democrats.

(Source: foxnews.com)

And yet, Republicans will continue to insist that there is rampant voter fraud and you’ll notice that they’ll claim it happens most in places where people mostly vote democrat.

(Source: kateoplis)

Al Franken wants The Disclose Act to pass and so do I.

Watch Republicans be full of shit in real time via The Daily Show.

"

Three Democrats walked out of a House Oversight and Government Reform hearing on religious liberty and the birth control rule on Thursday to protest Chairman Darrell Issa’s (R-Calif.) refusal to allow a progressive woman to testify in favor of the Obama administration’s contraception rule. The morning panel at the hearing consisted exclusively of men from conservative religious organizations.

Delegate Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-D.C.), told reporters in the hallway outside the hearing that she marched out because it was being conducted like an “autocratic regime.” The other members who left were Reps. Carolyn Maloney (D-N.Y.) and Mike Quigley (D-Ill.).

There are 10 witnesses testifying at Thursday’s hearing. None of those individuals — listed as testifying prior to hearing — are in favor of the Obama administration’s birth control rule, and few are women.

Barry Lynn, executive director of Americans United for Separation of Church and State, was listed as a witness for the hearing, but Simon Brown, a spokesman for Americans United, told The Huffington Post that Lynn will not be testifying. (He will, however, be submitting written testimony to the committee.)

Democrats say they tried to invite another witness — a young woman — to testify, but were blocked by Republicans.

Issa said at the hearing that he rejected the Democrats’ female witness, Sandra Fluke, because, as a Georgetown University law student who “appears to have become energized over this issue,” she was “not appropriate or qualified.” He said that in lieu of allowing her to speak at the hearing, he instructed his staff to post a video online of Fluke speaking at a previous press conference.

"

The Huffington Post, “House Democrats Walk Out of One-Sided Hearing on Contraception, Calling It an ‘Autocratic Regime.”

So much for this.

Relevant.

(via inothernews)

President Barack Obama’s decision to require most employers to cover birth control and insurers to offer it at no cost has created a firestorm of controversy. But the central mandate—that most employers have to cover preventative care for women—has been law for over a decade. This point has been completely lost in the current controversy, as Republican presidential candidates and social conservatives claim that Obama has launched a war on religious liberty and the Catholic Church.

{…]

In December 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission ruled that companies that provided prescription drugs to their employees but didn’t provide birth control were in violation of Title VII of the 1964 Civil Rights Act, which prevents discrimination on the basis of sex.

That opinion, which the George W. Bush administration did nothing to alter or withdraw when it took office the next month, is still in effect today.

(Source: Mother Jones, via inothernews)

soupsoup:


Private sector jobs created by Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton’s first three years in office.

soupsoup:

Private sector jobs created by Barack Obama, George W. Bush, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton’s first three years in office.

(via inothernews)

"Why is it that when Republicans and Democrats need to solve the budget and the deficit, there’s deadlock, but when Hollywood lobbyists pay them $94 million dollars to write legislation, people from both sides of the aisle line up to co-sponsor it?"

— Reddit Founder Alexis Ohanian on CNBC. (via wilwheaton)

(via inothernews)

"The Governor (Mitt Romney) used a term earlier that I shrink from, and it’s one I don’t think we should be using as Republicans: “middle class.” There are no ‘classes’ in America. We are a country that don’t (sic) allow for titles. We don’t put people in ‘classes.’ …But the idea that we’re somehow or other that we’re gonna buy into the class warfare arguments of Barack Obama, something that should not be part of Republican lexicon. That’s their job: divide, separate; put one group against another."

Republican shitstain RICK SANTORUM, at tonight’s debate.

These are actual words uttered by a divisive, stupid fuckwit of a non-human, out-of-touch prick.

(via inothernews)

kateoplis:

Lobbyists to American Bankers Assoc: an $850,000 anti-OWS campaign
“It has the potential to have very long-lasting political, policy and financial impacts on the companies in the center of the bullseye.”

Banking lobbyists don’t like OWS.  Go figure.

kateoplis:

Lobbyists to American Bankers Assoc: an $850,000 anti-OWS campaign

“It has the potential to have very long-lasting political, policy and financial impacts on the companies in the center of the bullseye.”

Banking lobbyists don’t like OWS.  Go figure.

"

I find it ironic that Republicans have such disdain for the lazy, and yet their solution to everything is do nothing. Their answer to wealth inequality? Do nothing. Healthcare? Do nothing. Climate change? Nothing. Racism? Doesn’t exist. For a group of people so head over heels in love with self-reliance, they sure do recommend a lot of sitting on (one’s) ass.

If A Christmas Carol was performed by the Tea Party Dramatic Society, it would be a cautionary tale about how the hero, Scrooge — a blameless job creator — is turned into a socialist through the corrupting influence of Tiny Tim. And the play would end with a simple, plaintive question from Mr. Scrooge: ‘Just how much of my wealth does Mr. Tim think he’s entitled to?’

And that is the great Republican fallacy of this election: that our economic problem are due not to Wall Street’s gambling, but because too many Americans are lazy. But there are 16 million unemployed, and we only created 80,000 jobs last month. The problem isn’t laziness — it’s math.

This is where the Republican Party is now: in favor of people dying because they don’t have health insurance. In favor of letting people go unfed if they won’t work. And if they wanna work, but are Mexicans, in favor of putting up a fence that electrocutes them.

"

BILL MAHER, Real Time (via inothernews)

"

For the second time in 10 days, the Senate on Thursday rejected Democratic efforts to take up a jobs bill championed by President Obama.

The vote to advance the bill was 50 to 50. Democrats needed 60 votes to overcome a Republican filibuster.

This time, the bill was narrowed to provide $35 billion to state and local governments to prevent layoffs of teachers, police officers and firefighters. To offset the cost, the bill would impose a surtax of 0.5 percent, starting in 2013, on income in excess of $1 million.

Despite the vote Thursday, Democrats said they hoped to gain a political edge, by forcing Republicans to vote on this and other discrete parts of broader legislation proposed by Mr. Obama to create jobs and revive the economy.

Campaigning for his $447 billion jobs package this week in North Carolina and Virginia, Mr. Obama suggested that Republicans could not understand the whole thing all at once, so he said “we’re going to chop it up into some bite-sized pieces.”

The Senate last week blocked consideration of the larger bill, which included a 5.6 percent surtax on income over $1 million.

"

The New York Times, “Obama’s Jobs Plan Again Blocked by Senate Republicans.”

Just so we’re clear: Obama wants jobs.  Republicans don’t.  Also, Republicans don’t give a fuck, apparently, about cops, teachers, or firefighters.  Or the economy, we’d guess.  This is a good strategy!  See y’all in 2012.

(via inothernews)