Nothing about the trailer blows me away but I have tons of good feelings about what’s going on here. I’m in.

bbook:

Watch the First Trailer for Woody Allen’s ‘Blue Jasmine’

It’s not like I wasn’t going to watch whatever Woody Allen put out next anyway, but this looks terrific.

xombiedirge:

Cinema Inspired Illustrations by Alice X. Zhang / Tumblr / Store

Previews from the ‘MOMENTS’ solo art show, opening June 7th 2013 at the Bottleneck Gallery / Facebook.

Tags: movies art

a-bittersweet-life:

image

Watch, Learn, and Absorb! Edge of Outside: A History of Independent Cinema is a fascinating documentary that presents a historical view of Independent Cinema through the stories of various filmmakers who embody the independent film spirit. It opens with author Peter Biskind defining the…

(via bbook)

Conclusion form today’s lunch: There are two big misnomers surrounding the career of Brad Pitt.

1. Brad Pitt is a charismatic screen presence.

Think of the last time Pitt was actually charismatic on screen. I’ve got two: Fight Club and Thelma and Louise (it was posited that Pitt’s TaL charisma was ab-based, but anyway…). That’s about it. He doesn’t have the type of Robert Downey Jr./George Clooney/early-Will Smith charisma that is often assumed of him. The type of charisma that - had he had it - might have made The Curious Case of Benjamin Button more enjoyable but he doesn’t and I don’t know anyone who thinks he deserved that particular Oscar nomination.

2. Brad Pitt is a handsome leading man and lacks real talent.

Do you know why he was so charming in Fight Club? Because he’s such a good actor. He’s barely even a leading man. His best performances are supporting roles: Se7en, 12 Monkeys, Fight Club, Snatch, Babel, and Burn After Reading are all second banana parts wherein he often steals the show from someone else (the exception: he’s the lead in Moneyball, which is among his best, though not his absolute best). Pitt is a character actor walking around with a leading man’s body. It happens sometimes. So while he’s serviceable and things like Mr. and Mrs. Smith and he’s sure to be the same in World War Z, we already know he’s better when he can get weird as in Inglorious Basterds or when he can just hang out and smoke pot as in True Romance, letting the real leading men like Christian Slater do their thing.

No, I’m kidding. Christian Slater is the worst. Even in spite of Heathers.

xombiedirge:

Preview of the Coen Brothers inspired art show, ‘Over The Line!’, opening June 7th at Ltd. Art Gallery / Tumblr.

Maybe it was Utah by Craig Church / Twitter

You Seek a Great Fortune by Ian Glaubinger / Website / Twitter / Store 

I’m Not Going to Debate you Jerry by Paul Ainsworth / Tumblr / Twitter

The Big Lebowski by Chet Phillips / Store

Anton Chigurh by Clay Sisk / Tumblr

Not a Good Man by Todd Spence / Tumblr

Fucking love the Goodman piece. I want that so bad.

bbook:


Vesth claims that they, “shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex, and in post we will digital-impose the two…So above the waist it will be the star and the below the waist it will be the doubles.” 

Lars von Trier’s ‘Nymphomaniac’ Will Digitally Morph Its Stars With Their Porn Body Doubles

Von Trier is making himself some high-tech art porn.

bbook:

Vesth claims that they, “shot the actors pretending to have sex and then had the body doubles, who really did have sex, and in post we will digital-impose the two…So above the waist it will be the star and the below the waist it will be the doubles.” 

Lars von Trier’s ‘Nymphomaniac’ Will Digitally Morph Its Stars With Their Porn Body Doubles

Von Trier is making himself some high-tech art porn.

totalfilm:

 Karl Urban talks Dredd sequel
Karl Urban has been discussing the possibility of a sequel to Dredd, and says that despite the film’s relatively poor box office showing, there could yet be scope for a follow-up…

I’d love to see it. Urban’s Dredd was great.

totalfilm:

Karl Urban talks Dredd sequel

Karl Urban has been discussing the possibility of a sequel to Dredd, and says that despite the film’s relatively poor box office showing, there could yet be scope for a follow-up…

I’d love to see it. Urban’s Dredd was great.

Alfonso Cuaron’s first feature since Children of Men in 2006 looks like a fucking blast.

This might be fun but God, that’s a stupid title.

Gonna have to see The World’s End.

(Source: rosetylear, via cinemanotebooks)

I know that a movie like this is supposed to be important or something but the reason I’ll see it is because of all of the famous actors playing historical figures. We get Robin Williams as Eisenhower, James Marsden as JFK, Liev Shreiber and Johnson, John Cusack as Nixon and Alan Rickman and Raegan. There’s no Ford or Carter listed on IMDb, so we’ll have to see what happens with them but I always think these are fun.

Sounds good, Shane Black, I’m down.

Thoughts on ‘Iron Man 3’

1. Meh. Just go see it. It’s super enjoyable, better than the second but not quite as good as the first. If that’s what you’re looking for, that’s my endorsement. Anyway:

2. After Earth is definitely going to be Will Smith’s first unequivocal bomb, isn’t it? I’m seeing trailers for it before everything and nothing about it looks appealing. Audiences I’m with always seem to check out halfway through. It’s big and expensive and sci fi and feels a lot like this year’s John Carter. It’s also a pretty well kept secret that it’s being directed by M. Night Shyamalan. Remember when that guy’s name was the selling point of a movie? It wasn’t that long ago. This has nothing to do with Iron Man.

3. Ben Kingsley is brilliant in this movie. Seriously brilliant. The role is perfect for him in a way I can’t describe and you can only understand if you have a good idea of the breadth of Kingsley’s work.

4. The best part of the movie, though, is the second act where you barely get any of Tony Stark in the armor and mostly you get Robert Downey Jr. playing around with a boy in rural Tennessee. I know, it makes no sense at all. There is minimal action but the one sequence of action we do get is small-scale and the best in the movie. There are a lot of clever, fun ways the film keeps Downey out of full Iron Man armor during action sequences, to its benefit. The climax is a hell of a spectacle but I’ll be damned if I actually saw half of it the way action movies are edited in this day and age.

5. I’m not even 25, how can I be opining for the old days?

6. What does Shane Black do now? Anyone who’s ever seen Kiss Kiss Bang Bang was and loved it (redundant) was glad to hear he would be on Iron Man 3. Now that the movie is good and breaking overseas box office records, he’s positioned himself nicely for a new project. Since Downey Jr. will be next seen in Avengers 2 and the fate of the Iron Man franchise as a solo act is in a post-third-movie limbo, it makes me think Black will be allowed to make something that he wants, as long as it has a modest budget. If it happens, I’ll be excited to see whatever he comes up with.

7. So… the fate of the Iron Man franchise. Marvel will want to bring Downey Jr. back because he’s the motor that runs this thing. People show up for him. But after 5 big screen outings as Tony Stark, one can imagine he’s getting tired. You wouldn’t know it to watch this sequel but how long can he last? Especially when money is no longer a concern for the man. What reason can Marvel dangle in front of him to bring him back for a 6th time in the armor?

8. Rebecca Hall was underused. Gwyneth Paltrow was used just right. Don Cheadle had some nice moments that made me smile even though part of me misses the dynamic established between Downey and Terrence Howard. At least Cheadle got to roll around and do something this movie. I want to see Guy Pearce and Val Kilmer play brothers in something. Something where they can bicker. I just was hearing Pearce read lines and I was struck by how similar his voice is to Kilmer. Plus, they’re both a little weird and now that Kilmer is fat, they’re a natural foil. This has gone off the rails a bit.